Battling the Baby Blues

PPD.real
All pregnant women look forward to that first precious moment when they can finally hold their newborn in their arms. That instant connection and the tremendous love felt for such a tiny little human is one they never could have imagined. But how does the story take such a different turn for approximately 10% of women who develop postpartum depression (PPD)? Why is it that shortly after delivery, so many women experience such profound depression and negative emotions towards their newborn?

One of the most challenging aspects of PPD is that many women feel guilty about their feelings. One the one hand, they just had a baby and should feel ecstatic, right? So when the answer is “Um…actually…no. Quite the contrary,” women may feel ashamed to admit this to their doctors. Which means that the current statistic stating that 10% of women experience PPD is likely a gross underestimation.

Treatment of PPD is of the utmost importance, for both the mother and infant’s wellbeing. Research has shown that infants of mothers with PPD exhibit higher cortisol (stress hormone) levels, increased sleep difficulty, and increased crying. These infants grow into children who demonstrate slower growth, decreased cognitive abilities, and greater risk of developmental delays compared to their peers whose mothers did not demonstrate PPD.

Laura Beil wrote an excellent article in Science News[i] which explains the hormonal and neurological pieces of the PPD puzzle. When women are pregnant, they experience an upsurge of the hormones progesterone and estrogen. These hormone levels drop significantly and suddenly after delivery. This abrupt halt in the body’s hormone production may result in a whiplash effect that results in the depression and/or anxiety associated with PPD.

Researchers have studied certain areas of the brain, including the amygdala, hippocampus, and nucleus accubens, and they compared these areas between women who demonstrate PPD to those who do not. A Functional MRI study revealed that both mothers with and without PPD demonstrated elevated amygdala activity, decreased stress, and more positive emotions when they were shown pictures of their own infants. However, mothers experiencing PPD showed a similar response to other infants, indicating a “desensitization” of sorts to their own infant which may make it difficult for them to bond in a unique way with their own child[ii].

Furthermore, one study has shown an inverse correlation between third trimester oxytocin levels with PPD (higher levels of oxytocin were associated with lower risks of PPD). The proposed explanation for this is that oxytocin, which peaks during delivery, is a hormone that contributes to maternal-fetal bonding. Lower levels of oxytocin or impaired hormone receptors may interfere with the bonding of mother with new baby as well as contribute to depression.

Maguire and Mody of Tufts University[iii] have previously proven that during pregnancy, the hippocampus has fewer neurosteroid receptors compared to non-pregnant women. This is to protect the brain from the increased amounts of progesterone and estrogen during pregnancy. Fewer receptors means that the elevated hormone levels won’t pack as big of a punch as they otherwise would have.  Typically, after delivery, the number of receptors rises once again to allow the now normal amounts of progesterone and estrogen to do their jobs as per usual.

Based on this, Maguire decided to perform a fascinating experiment to further explore the hormone-brain-mood connection. Maguire genetically modified certain mice to lack these neurosteroid receptors. This resulted in decreased maternal-fetal bonding and levels of care. However, when these same mice were administered a progesterone based neurosteroid to mimic the levels of progesterone present during pregnancy, the mice suddenly tended to their offspring and bonded with them.

This begs the obvious question- can similar hormone therapy help alleviate PPD? Would providing supplemental amounts of progesterone obviate the intense postpartum hormone changes to the point that it can eliminate PPD? Maguire has been seeking answers to these questions, particularly by studying brexanolone, a progesterone based neurosteroid. In a randomized controlled trial, women who were given brexanolone demonstrated on average a 21- point reduction on one depression scale compared to 9- point reduction for women given a placebo. Sage Therapeutics, the pharmaceutical company developing the drug, will be seeking U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval soon. These preliminary findings are extremely promising, and it will hopefully lead to improved treatment of PPD thereby improving maternal-fetal relationships.

[i] Laura Beil. (2018) Depression among new mothers is finally getting some attention. Science News 193:5, page 16.

[ii] K.E. Wonch et al. Postpartum depression and brain response to infants: Differential amygdala response and connectivity. Social Neuroscience. Published online January 18, 2016. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2015.1131193.

[iii] J. Maguire and I. Mody. GABAAR Plasticity during Pregnancy: Relevance to Postpartum Depression. Neuron. Vol. 59, July 31, 2008, p. 207. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.06.019.

From Class to Clinic

classroom.2.15.18clinic.2.15.18
As a graduate student, one of my least favorite classes was my research class (said with all due respect, Dr. Lipovac. As the famous adage goes, it wasn’t you, it was me). I was more interested in anatomy, physiology, neurological rehabilitation, kinesiology, and, of course, my musculoskeletal classes.

Ironically enough, the topic of research moved to the top of my priority list as soon as I left the classroom and entered the clinic. Suddenly, I was faced with many clinical questions, and my ever-curious mind began seeking answers. For example, is sexual dysfunction more prevalent in societies where premarital intercourse is discouraged? Is there a connection between patients who have had eating disorders and pelvic floor dysfunction? Is pelvic organ prolapse (POP) more prevalent among women who have had vaginal deliveries as opposed to cesarean section (c-section) deliveries?

Before I knew it, I was perusing PubMed and the NIH websites for fun, during my free time, to explore evidenced based research for these and other answers. I found myself offering to help doctors with clinical trials that they were conducting. Research is now an integral focus of my time and energy, and it is one of the reasons that I write this blog- to encourage myself to remain abreast of the latest research as well as share it with you.

Considering this background about the history of my relationship with research, you can imagine how excited I was when a colleague of mine, Chayala Englard, shared an article with me from BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (January 2013) which answered one of the aforementioned questions.

The article explores the prevalence of symptomatic POP in women twenty years after either one vaginal delivery or one c-section delivery. Women who delivered vaginally were twice as likely to experience POP compared to women who delivered via c-section (14.6% vs. 6.3%). Furthermore, infant birth-weight and mother’s current BMI were found to be risk factors associated with POP after vaginal delivery. Mothers shorter than 160 cm (approximately 5’3”) whose infants weighed more than 4,000 grams (approximately 8 lb. 13 oz.) were twice as likely to develop prolapse compared to mothers of the same height who delivered infants weighing less than 4,000 grams. In addition, POP prevalence increased 3% with each unit increase of the mother’s BMI as well as 3% for every 100 gram (approximately 3.5 oz) increase of the infant’s birth-weight.

In addition, urinary incontinence was more prevalent among women who demonstrated prolapse compared to women who did not. However, episiotomy, vacuum extraction, and second-degree laceration (or greater) were not correlated with increased POP prevalence compared to women who delivered spontaneously.

Does this mean that all women should request elective c-section deliveries? Absolutely not! C-section delivery is a surgery and is accompanied by the same risks and complications of any surgery. However, this evidenced based research indicates that it may be worth discussing with your doctor if you have a personal history or family history of prolapse. It is valuable information that can help you and your doctor make an informed decision together.

And so, another clinical question gets answered thanks to research! Onto the many others that are continuously developing day by day.

Gyhagen, M., Bullarbo, M., Nielsen, T. and Milsom, I. (2013), Prevalence and risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse 20 years after childbirth: a national cohort study in singleton primiparae after vaginal or caesarean delivery. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 120: 152–160. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.12020