Just a Spoonful of Iodine

salt-1884166_640

Anyone who grew up on Mary Poppins is well familiar with the concept that “a spoonful of sugar helps the medicine go down.” But no Disney movie taught us that a small amount of salt, or any other source of iodine, can help increase fertility. The research which has proven this fact has only recently become available.

Until recently, iodine, which is found in iodized salt, seafood, dairy products, and certain fruit and vegetables, has been known primarily for its metabolic properties.  In addition, it regulates bone growth and brain development in children.  Furthermore, the developing fetus requires iodine to produce thyroid hormone.

According to a recent study published by the National Institutes of Health, adequate iodine is associated with fertility. Women who demonstrated moderate to severe iodine deficiency may have a harder time achieving pregnancy compared to women with normal levels. This is especially relevant considering that approximately 30% of childbearing women in the United States exhibit insufficient iodine levels.

The study included 467 North American couples between the years 2005-2009.  Upon enrollment, participants provided urine samples which enabled researchers to study their iodine levels.  Iodine levels were deemed “sufficient” in 55.7% of participants, “mildly deficient” in 21.8% of participants, “moderately deficient” in 20.8% of participants, and “severely deficient” in 1.7% of participants.   

Researchers used a statistical measure called the fecundability odds ratio (FOR) to predict a couple’s likelihood of conceiving.  A FOR less than one indicated decreased likelihood of achieving pregnancy, and a FOR higher than one indicated increased likelihood. Researchers were fascinated to discover that women who had moderate to severe iron deficiency demonstrated 46% decreased likelihood of becoming pregnant compared to women with normal iodine levels. 

Fertility is a very sensitive topic, and I not suggesting that consuming more salt is a cure all or quick fix. If only it could be that simple. However, I am suggesting that perhaps a conversation with one’s doctor about diet, vitamins, and minerals is appropriate, especially considering that many women are iodine deficient. This one little mineral can make a huge difference, and it is worth further discussion and exploration. And like all the happy endings to every Disney movie, may everyone’s fertility hopes and dreams come true.

Nursing News

breastfeeding.12.12.17
To breastfeed or not to breastfeed? Many of my postpartum clients have asked themselves this question. Ultimately, each woman must arrive at a decision that best suits her lifestyle and needs, and she should be respected for whatever choice she makes. My purpose in writing this blog is to review relevant medical data, both old and new, so that readers can make an informed decision.

Breastfeeding benefits both newborn and mother alike. The World Health Organization (WHO), the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologist (ACOG) recommend that mothers breastfeed their infants for at least twelve months, six of which should be to the exclusion of formula or other foods[1][2][3].  This is due to the nutritional benefit supplied to the infant which is believed to promote growth and development.

Not only does breastfeeding nourish the infant, but it also benefits the mother by reducing her risk of developing diseases such as breast and ovarian cancer. It also promotes postpartum weight loss[4][5][6]. A proposed explanation for why breastfeeding offers these benefits is associated with its amenorrheic properties. In other words, breastfeeding is associated with extended loss of menses after childbirth which in turn promotes oxytocin and prolactin levels while reducing gonadotropin levels in the circulatory system. These changes benefit the mother’s health and reduce disease risk[7]

Much of this information is probably not new to my readership. However, a prospective cohort study recently published in the BMJ (the journal formerly known as the British Medical Journal) revealed fascinating results[8], namely that longer periods of both total and exclusive breastfeeding are correlated with decreased risk of endometriosis.

Endometriosis, a gynecologic disease which involves growth of uterine tissue outside of the uterine walls, is diagnosed in approximately 10% of American women. It is associated with chronic pelvic pain, especially during one’s period, as well as dyspareunia (pain during intercourse) and bowel dysfunction. (For more on endometriosis, please refer to my previous blog on the topic, “The Most Common Disease You’ve Never Heard Of”).

Through this study, which included more than 72,000 women and lasted from 1989 to 2011, researchers discovered that:

  • Among those who reported a lifetime total length of breastfeeding of less than one month, 453 endometriosis cases occurred/100,000 person years vs. 184 cases which occurred/100,000 person years in those who reported a lifetime total of breastfeeding for greater than or equal to 36 months.
  • Each additional three months of total breastfeeding per infant was associated with 8% decreased risk of endometriosis as well as 14% decreased risk per each additional three months of exclusive breastfeeding.
  • Women were 40% less likely to develop endometriosis if they nursed for a grand total of 36 months or more over their reproductive life compared to women who never breastfed.

As with the aforementioned maternal breastfeeding benefits, it is hypothesized that the prolonged lack of menstruation and associated hormonal changes are to thank for the decreased risk of endometriosis, because endometrial lesions are dependent on estrogen for their growth.

Prior to this study, very few modifiable risk factors have been identified for endometriosis. This study indicates that breastfeeding may be an important player in reducing the risk of endometriosis for expectant mothers. While future research is warranted to better understand this correlation, the information presented in this study should be considered by mothers who are deciding whether to breastfeed their newborn, especially if they have a known history of endometriosis.

Aside from breastfeeding, pelvic floor physical therapy is an evidenced based modality to treat symptoms of endometriosis, especially pelvic pain and pelvic floor muscle overactivity. If you or someone you know has endometriosis and stands to benefit from our services at Revitalize Physical Therapy, please share this information. We look forward to helping in any way possible!

[1]Ip S, Chung M, Raman G, et al. Breastfeeding and maternal and infant health outcomes in developed countries. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep)2007;358:1-186.pmid:17764214

[2]  American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Obstetric Practice Breastfeeding Expert Work Group. Committee Opinion No. 658: Optimizing Support for Breastfeeding as Part of Obstetric Practice. Obstet Gynecol2016;358:e86-92. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000001318 pmid:26942393.

[3] Section on Breastfeeding. Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics2012;358:e827-41.doi:10.1542/peds.2011-3552 pmid:22371471.

[4] Chowdhury R, Sinha B, Sankar MJ, et al. Breastfeeding and maternal health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Paediatr2015;358:96-113. doi:10.1111/apa.13102 pmid:26172878.

[5] Stuebe AM, Willett WC, Xue F, Michels KB. Lactation and incidence of premenopausal breast cancer: a longitudinal study.Arch Intern Med2009;358:1364-71. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2009.231 pmid:19667298.

[6] Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer. Breast cancer and breastfeeding: collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 47 epidemiological studies in 30 countries, including 50302 women with breast cancer and 96973 women without the disease. Lancet2002;358:187-95. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09454-0 pmid:12133652

[7] McNeilly AS. Lactational control of reproduction. Reprod Fertil Dev2001;358:583-90.doi:10.1071/RD01056 pmid:11999309

[8]Farland, V, Eliassen, AH, et al. BMJ 2017; 358 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j3778 (Published 29 August 2017)Cite this as: BMJ 2017;358:j3778